Compare commits

..

No commits in common. "a6646d0e240e7229e2a0b5b9c91c8b5a908a0656" and "ef9c05010b1e9a26a552dedd62f789f4f058e8d1" have entirely different histories.

View File

@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ S_1&=&\{(x_0,\dots,x_n)\in\RR^{n+1}|\sum x_i=1, x_i\geq1\}&& \\
\end{center} \end{center}
\end{figure} \end{figure}
As we can see in Figure \ref{fig:triangulo}, the hypersurfaces defined by $\{x_i=0\}$ divide the space in $2^{n+1}-1$ sections. We denote each of these sections as $(\pm,\dots,\pm)$ indicating which coordinates are greater or equal to $0$ and which are lower or equal to $0$. For example, the triangle corresponding to $S_1$ would be $(+,\dots,+)$. We denote each section as $(\pm,\dots,\pm)$ indicating which coordinates are greater or equal to $0$ and which are lower or equal to $0$. For example, the triangle corresponding to $S_1$ would be $(+,\dots,+)$.
Note that there is no section $(-,\dots,-)$. Note that there is no section $(-,\dots,-)$.
The retraction in $(+,\dots,+)$ is the identity for any value of $t$. For the rest of the parts, we define a retraction: The retraction in $(+,\dots,+)$ is the identity for any value of $t$. For the rest of the parts, we define a retraction:
@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ We have then defined $\Delta^d$, the simplicial complex with which we can identi
The map $\Delta^d\longrightarrow\Delta^d_\text{proj}$ is given by $(x_0,\dots,x_n)\longrightarrow[x_0:\dots:x_n]$. Since we are passing to the projective plane, two points $(x_0\xi_0, \dots, x_n\xi_n)$ and $(x_0\xi_0\xi, \dots, x_n\xi_n\xi)$ will have the same image. The map $\Delta^d\longrightarrow\Delta^d_\text{proj}$ is given by $(x_0,\dots,x_n)\longrightarrow[x_0:\dots:x_n]$. Since we are passing to the projective plane, two points $(x_0\xi_0, \dots, x_n\xi_n)$ and $(x_0\xi_0\xi, \dots, x_n\xi_n\xi)$ will have the same image.
The $n$-cells $X_{(\xi_0, \dots, \xi_n)}$ and $X_{(\xi_0\xi, \dots, \xi_n\xi)}$ of $\Delta^d$, project the same $n$-cell of $\Delta^d_\textrm{proj}$, which will be denoted as $X_{[\xi_0: \dots: \xi_n]}$. The $n$-cells $X_{(\xi_0, \dots, \xi_n)}$ and $X_{(\xi_0\xi, \dots, \xi_n\xi)}$ of $\Delta^d$, project the same $n$-cell of $\Delta^d_\textrm{proj}$, which will be denoted as $X_{[\xi_0: \dots: \xi_n]}$.
The same convention is followed for the rest of $i-$simplices. Note that for the vertices, since all coordinates but one are $0$, we have only $n+1$ vertices $X^0, \dots, X^n$. The same convention is followed for the rest of $i-$simplices. Note that for the vertices, since all coordinates but one are $0$, we have only three vertices $X^0, \dots, X^n$.
The group $\mu_d^{n+1}$ also acts, but the action of the diagonal vectors is trivial. Let us denote The group $\mu_d^{n+1}$ also acts, but the action of the diagonal vectors is trivial. Let us denote
\[ \[
@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ Delta_Complex = DeltaComplex_hypersurface(4,6)
Once we have gotten the $\Delta$-complex, we can compute the fundamental group or the cohomology of the space, for example. Once we have gotten the $\Delta$-complex, we can compute the fundamental group or the cohomology of the space, for example.
\begin{python} \begin{python}
Dc = SimplicialSet(Delta_Complex) Dc = SimplicialSet(Delta_Complex)
dc_punto = it commit Dc.set_base_point(Dc.all_n_simplices(0)[0]) dc_punto = Dc.set_base_point(Dc.all_n_simplices(0)[0])
dc_punto.fundamental_group() dc_punto.fundamental_group()
-> Finitely presented group < e0 | e0^6 > -> Finitely presented group < e0 | e0^6 >
dc_punto.cohomology() dc_punto.cohomology()